Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '22 at 12:45
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 341
51% 371 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Lighting 44.2
Reflection 41.7
Parallax 39.5
36% 41.8 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 42.2
Splatting 27.9
29% 35.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 245 217 212 238 261 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 440
Write 406
Mixed 350
SusWrite 254
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 94.8
4K Mixed 44.2
160% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 236
213% 324 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 118%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
833GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 84 84 82 85 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 72.7
Write 60.7
Mixed 51
SusWrite 83.1
49% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 51%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
613GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 45 46 44 45 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 13.1
Write 28.6
Mixed 15.6
SusWrite 45.5
19% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
52% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
236GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 105 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 82.2
Mixed 69
SusWrite 104
64% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57%
Great: 60%
Adata XPG EX500 1TB
662GB free
Firmware: 9303
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 9.8 9.8 9.9 9.9 9.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
5.12% Terrible
Read 8
Write 8.5
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 9.8
6% 8.52 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 5.12%
Great: 74%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 124GB
116GB free, PID db8a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 37.8
25% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.7
107% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/8GX KHX1866C9D3/8GX KHX1600C9D3/8GX KHX1866C9D3/8GX 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.4% Above average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 16.3
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 16
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $1,025
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback