Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Sempron 140-$9 2,532 User benchmarks, average bench 35% CPU1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Memory 37.4 1-Core 22.1 2-Core 19.7 20% 26.4 Pts	4-Core 20.4 8-Core 20.7 3% 20.5 Pts	64-Core 22.2 1% 22.2 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 43%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25 14,710 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1AC0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 38 52 51 59 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	Read 64.1 Write 78 Mixed 46.3 SusWrite 47.2 44% 58.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 3GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 667, 667 MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	7.71% Terrible	MC Read 2.1 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 2.1 7% 2.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 2 7% 2.37 GB/s	Latency 215 19% 215 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 7.71% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	4x
Athlon II X4 635AMDBench 45%, 5,306 samples	4x
Phenom 9550AMDBench 43%, 2,773 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce 6150SE nForce 430NvidiaBench 0%, 4,836 samples	8x
Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples	2x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	2x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	3x
NT2GT64U8HD0BY-AD 2x2GBNanyaBench 14%, 164 samples	2x
OCZ2VU6672G OCZ2VU6672G 4GBUnknownBench 21%, 7 samples	2x