Emachines ET1331

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemEmachines ET1331  (all builds)
MotherboardeMachines ET1331
Memory1.4 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1280 x 960 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091210
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 16 '19 at 19:24
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 255
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
44.7% Average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 46
2-Core 90.3
46% 70.2 Pts
4-Core 90.6
8-Core 90.3
12% 90.4 Pts
64-Core 91.1
6% 91.1 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6150SE nForce 430
Acer(1025 0181) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 307.83
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
813GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 69 69 73 49 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 75.5
Write 96.3
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 66.8
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 3GB
400, 400 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
22.9% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 7.6
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ET1331 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Emachines ET1331

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback