MSI MPG Z590 GAMING PLUS (MS-7D07)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics79.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D07
MotherboardMSI MPG Z590 GAMING PLUS (MS-7D07)  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '22 at 23:57
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 88.4
1-Core 112
2-Core 248
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 814
81% 661 Pts
64-Core 1,237
76% 1,237 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.7% Very good
Lighting 96.6
Reflection 114
Parallax 102
79% 104 fps
MRender 94.7
Gravity 100
Splatting 103
82% 99.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 446
Write 368
Mixed 194
74% 336 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 21.1
73% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 83.2
DQ Mixed 16
51% 115 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 108%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
207GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 51 52 31 16 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 10.4
Write 15.7
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 34
13% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GVK 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 41
MC Mixed 27.3
105% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 29.8
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z590 GAMING PLUS (MS-7D07) Builds (Compare 3,657 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z590 GAMING PLUS (MS-7D07)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $900
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback