Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	41.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Intel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds)
Memory	27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180424
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 28 '22 at 10:26
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2450 0 156 User benchmarks, average bench 64% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Memory 75.5 1-Core 67.9 2-Core 139 56% 94.2 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 532 46% 394 Pts	64-Core 645 40% 645 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP 38,816 User benchmarks, average bench 41% AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.8% Average	Lighting 51 Reflection 60 Parallax 69.8 42% 60.3 fps	MRender 59.5 Gravity 54.5 Splatting 43.8 42% 52.6 fps
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Yeston Extreme 250G 250GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q052 SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 223 236 235 237 233 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.9% Good	Read 193 Write 234 Mixed 171 SusWrite 233 47% 208 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 50.1 4K Mixed 37.3 97% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 114 107% 164 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 109%
Seagate ST3000NM0053-1C1178 3TB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2TB free Firmware: 0105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 26.7 Write 25.9 Mixed 21.9 SusWrite 13.5 16% 22 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: 0105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 25.4 Write 25.5 Mixed 22.8 SusWrite 13.5 16% 21.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.5 138% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70BH0- 32GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	43.9% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 14.9 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 9.2 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 89.3 45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 78%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

RAM
M393B5170FH0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 660 samples	38x
36JSZF51272PZ 2x4GBMicronBench 46%, 364 samples	36x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	33x

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $107

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16