MSI Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMSI MS-7984
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984)  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '18 at 14:24
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 133
2-Core 261
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 541
72% 537 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
PwrHis(1787 2328) 2GB
CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.11.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Lighting 40.1
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 52.3
33% 41.3 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 34.5
Splatting 38.9
28% 33.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nfn025sa 356-6000300 256GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 447 446 449 451 448 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
114% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 454
Mixed 406
SusWrite 445
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 37
187% 74.1 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 50.3
94% 183 MB/s
Seagate ST3000NM0053-1C1178 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: G007
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 181 180 180 181 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 177
Mixed 90.8
SusWrite 180
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
225% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
4GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 5.7 5.7 5.6 5.6 5.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
4.89% Terrible
Read 16.5
Write 6
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 5.6
9% 8.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.89%
Great: 6%
ASMT 2105 750GB
668GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 109 107 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 105
Write 84.3
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 108
105% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W6451U66J7240ND 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83% Excellent
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 27
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 25.4
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 61.1
66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 83%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984) Builds (Compare 1,241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984) - $174

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $768
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback