ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Nitro AN515-52

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	4.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Acer Nitro AN515-52 (all builds)
Motherboard	CFL Freed_CFS
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20180713
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 27 '22 at 22:32
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 90.3 1-Core 121 2-Core 238 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 404 8-Core 538 60% 471 Pts	64-Core 539 33% 539 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 1264) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	4.12% Terrible	Lighting 5.5 Reflection 31.4 Parallax 6.5 4% 14.5 fps	MRender 9.3 Gravity 5.1 Splatting 0.1 3% 4.83 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.12% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55 55,360 User benchmarks, average bench 166% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 96 54 68 42 38 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.6% Very poor	Read 136 Write 103 Mixed 76.5 SusWrite 63.6 21% 95 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 21.2 4K Mixed 2.7 19% 8.93 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 39.4 DQ Mixed 87.6 70% 101 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 253%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: JU001J SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 64 64 69 69 68 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Read 126 Write 120 Mixed 55.3 SusWrite 66.8 68% 92.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.7 235% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CB8GS2666.C8ET Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 30.8 MC Mixed 22 80% 27.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 33.1 SC Mixed 24.3 72% 25 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Nitro AN515-52 Builds (Compare 5,487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-52

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	3,749x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	1,737x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,910x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,513x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	687x

SSD
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	832x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	255x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	196x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	603x
ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 19,360 samples	411x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	279x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback