TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock Z590 Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive352% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z590 Extreme  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210409
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 27 '22 at 14:30
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900KF-$255
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 145
2-Core 286
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 949
88% 736 Pts
64-Core 1,899
118% 1,899 Pts
Poor: 88% ↑
This bench: 95.7%
 Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Gigabyte(1458 404E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
145% Outstanding
Lighting 211
Reflection 195
Parallax 189
172% 198 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 148
Splatting 131
126% 158 fps
Poor: 135% ↑
This bench: 145%
 Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGP31-1000GM 1TB
861GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41062C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2343 2385 2415 2097 1533 1509 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
352% Outstanding
Read 2,680
Write 2429
Mixed 1,687
SusWrite 2,047
496% 2,211 MB/s
4K Read 54.5
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 73.2
238% 81.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,123
DQ Write 915
DQ Mixed 993
751% 1,011 MB/s
Poor: 173% ↑
This bench: 352%
 Great: 433%
T400S240G 240GB
64GB free
Firmware: Q0616B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 16 122 23 46 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 495
Write 429
Mixed 356
SusWrite 121
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 0.9
83% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 95
DQ Write 15
DQ Mixed 1
14% 37 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 51.9%
 Great: 93%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 193 193 195 195 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 185
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 194
110% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 112%
 Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2G43AB3-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
74.7% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 22.3
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 24.2
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 60.1
67% 60.1 ns
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 74.7%
 Great: 107%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z590 Extreme Builds (Compare 935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z590 Extreme

CPU
Core i7-11700Intel  $200Bench 98%, 20,430 samples194x
Core i7-11700KIntel  $234Bench 101%, 65,651 samples144x
Core i5-11600KIntel  $180Bench 99%, 43,966 samples92x
GPU
Quadro P400NvidiaBench 9%, 5,817 samples163x
T400NvidiaBench 18%, 717 samples79x
RTX 3080Nvidia  $435Bench 187%, 424,051 samples62x
SSD
870 Evo 250GBSamsung  $45Bench 101%, 14,082 samples248x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $70Bench 394%, 276,089 samples50x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples44x
RAM
Skill Intl F4-3600C18-8GVK 2x8GBGBench 96%, 3,505 samples193x
Skill Intl F4-3200C16-4GVRB 2x4GBGBench 72%, 106 samples59x
Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GVK 2x16GBGBench 94%, 11,497 samples22x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback