Panasonic CF-52PFN32PE

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	16.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6.01GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6.01GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Panasonic CF-52PFN32PE (all builds)
Motherboard	Panasonic CF52-3
Memory	1.4 GB free of 6.00781 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100824
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 27 '22 at 10:39
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	79%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70 23,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	45% Average	Memory 66 1-Core 40.1 2-Core 67.5 39% 57.9 Pts	4-Core 142 8-Core 139 19% 140 Pts	64-Core 145 9% 145 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(10F7 8338) 2.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.55% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 0.5 1% 0.8 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 0.5 0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.55% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB 36,832 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 4.1 2.6 3.9 5.2 5.2 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	16.7% Very poor	Read 68.2 Write 55.3 Mixed 121 SusWrite 4.5 14% 62.2 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 13.9 4K Mixed 5.3 30% 9.83 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 62.7 DQ Mixed 78.6 67% 102 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 90%
CF 256MB 0GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 0% 0GB free Firmware: 05/11/15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.9 0.8 0.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	0.5% Terrible	Read 0.7 Write 0.7 Mixed 0.7 SusWrite 0.8 1% 0.72 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 49% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.5% Great: 0%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 46GB 425 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1067, 1067, 0 MHz 4096, 2048, 40960 MB Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.5% Poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 7.9 20% 7 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4.2 12% 4.2 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CF-52PFN32PE Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CF-52PFN32PE

CPU
Core i5 M 520Intel $70Bench 40%, 23,644 samples	9x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	9x

SSD
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GBBench 71%, 36,832 samples	3x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	1x
SKC600256G 256GBKingstonBench 102%, 6,756 samples	1x

RAM
44GBUnknownBench 23%, 6,316 samples	4x
48GBUnknownBench 49%, 2,786 samples	3x
46GBUnknownBench 37%, 425 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $70

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16