Medion E15308

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMedion E15308  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION NS1xADR
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210811
Uptime3 Days
Run DateMay 26 '22 at 15:07
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD 3020e Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
29.6% Poor
Memory 35
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 134
43% 80.7 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 160
19% 148 Pts
64-Core 131
8% 131 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RadeonT Graphics
Device(2782 1100) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.30
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
2.02% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 2.9
2% 2.8 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.02%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S11-128G-PHISON-SSD-B16 128GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMBB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 29 21 28 21 19 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 286
Write 171
Mixed 57
SusWrite 25.9
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 16.7
4K Mixed 7.8
34% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 25.3
DQ Write 14.3
DQ Mixed 19.9
15% 19.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.1% Below average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.6
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 227
18% 227 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E15308 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E15308

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback