HP 23-q102a

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 23-q102a  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B45
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '22 at 10:35
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 82.8
2-Core 158
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 291
40% 294 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 2B45) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
4.47% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 5.8
4% 7 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 8.8
5% 5.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.47%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$64
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 342 346 335 358 358 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 352
Mixed 303
SusWrite 347
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 37.2
138% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 241
202% 293 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 130%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB
41GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 28 27 27 28 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 39.6
Write 29.5
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 27
40% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 1.3
403% 5.47 MB/s
DQ Read 6.9
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 1.3
437% 6.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
32.5% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.7
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 10.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 23-q102a Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 23-q102a

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback