Acer ACRPRDCT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer ACRPRDCT  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '22 at 23:14
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II N950
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 49.5
1-Core 29.7
2-Core 63.4
30% 47.5 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 123
16% 124 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 45%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4004RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 54 44 73 86 89 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.1% Poor
Read 224
Write 195
Mixed 111
SusWrite 65.4
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 8.5
33% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 75.4
DQ Mixed 35
41% 72.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 M471B5273DM0-CH9 8GB
1334, 1334 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
26.1% Poor
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 10.2
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ACRPRDCT Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer ACRPRDCT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $393
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback