To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '22 at 17:08
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 82
1-Core 64.9
2-Core 172
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 461
46% 376 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.7% Above average
Lighting 72.6
Reflection 113
Parallax 70.8
59% 85.5 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 73.5
Splatting 70.3
58% 70.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 60%
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Intel(8086 2010) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.25% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.8 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.7
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.25%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-256 256GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HCS1A25G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 172 214 204 170 185 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.4% Below average
Read 246
Write 217
Mixed 210
SusWrite 190
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 9.1
37% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 13.2
49% 107 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 98%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
364GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 84 87 87 87 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 86.9
Write 84.5
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 86.2
60% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 52%
ST500DM0 02-1BD142 500GB
178GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 26 26 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.3% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 21
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 25.5
31% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
54% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 8908 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.9% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 11.6
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12.5
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback