HP p6-2311l

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP p6-2311l  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ABF
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '22 at 15:15
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 167
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 326
42% 316 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
Sapphire(174B E151) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
5.79% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 6
6% 7.4 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 7.6
6% 7.03 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.79%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 233 234 238 239 238 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.6% Good
Read 217
Write 235
Mixed 216
SusWrite 235
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 33.9
110% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 125
115% 177 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 123%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
4GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 75.2
Write 72.9
Mixed 59.3
52% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
30GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 27 28 28 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 27.8
Write 23.3
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 27.9
19% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.4
115% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SMD-4G68H1P-16K Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6-2311l Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6-2311l

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback