Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive386% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory54.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211113
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateMay 25 '22 at 08:26
Run Duration318 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 139
2-Core 274
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 1,148
99% 845 Pts
64-Core 1,137
70% 1,137 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Asus(1043 8660) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 170
Parallax 168
133% 167 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 148
Splatting 127
123% 154 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1337 1684 1987 2074 2077 2059 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
386% Outstanding
Read 2,479
Write 2,138
Mixed 2,152
SusWrite 1,870
486% 2,160 MB/s
4K Read 76.5
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 104
345% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,679
DQ Write 1,278
DQ Mixed 1,434
1,085% 1,464 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 386%
Great: 435%
Toshiba HDWF180 8TB
357GB free
Firmware: GX0B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 119 124 118 121 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 117
Write 128
Mixed 73
SusWrite 120
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.9
251% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
104GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 101 100 101 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 184
Write 135
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 100
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
66GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 130 127 129 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 117
Write 74.5
Mixed 70.9
SusWrite 128
72% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
151GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 127 135 137 139 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 89.9
Write 84.9
Mixed 68
SusWrite 134
69% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
65% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
221GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 166 168 167 166 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 113
Mixed 82.6
SusWrite 165
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91%
Great: 113%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
101GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 44 44 43 44 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 106
Write 82.7
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 44.5
92% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 74%
Fantom External HDD 8TB
185GB free, PID b565
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 125 128 134 129 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 94.4
Write 102
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 126
130% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
191% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 55%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB
165GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 42 42 40 41 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 97.9
Write 102
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 42.1
98% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 53%
FD Fantom 8TB
2TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 55 54 53 54 54 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.8% Above average
Read 172
Write 156
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 54.7
141% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.6
210% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB
267GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 136 137 137 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 101
Write 107
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 137
138% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 26.8
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 24.1
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 800 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $848
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback