Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive293% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory55.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180307
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 24 '22 at 21:08
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 79.7
1-Core 126
2-Core 260
84% 155 Pts
4-Core 521
8-Core 897
86% 709 Pts
64-Core 1,714
106% 1,714 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 172
Parallax 159
142% 169 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 136
Splatting 116
116% 146 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 127%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
121GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 285 289 292 277 266 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 481
Mixed 466
SusWrite 300
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 61
210% 73.4 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 67
131% 265 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 120%
Great: 128%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1060 957 895 869 839 808 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
293% Outstanding
Read 2,415
Write 1,602
Mixed 1,201
SusWrite 905
340% 1,531 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 80.5
291% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,317
DQ Write 1,022
DQ Mixed 1,128
855% 1,156 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 293%
Great: 393%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 181 177 181 175 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 153
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 179
95% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
379GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 25 27 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.42% Terrible
Read 10.7
Write 19.6
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 22.1
14% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
45% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 9.42%
Great: 90%
Mass Storage Device 64GB
36GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 19 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 21.6
Write 18.4
Mixed 18.4
SusWrite 18.4
26% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 4.5
298% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M2Z3600C18 CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M2Z3600C18 64GB
2934, 2934, 2934, 2934 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66% Good
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 19.9
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 12.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 700 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,132
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $250Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback