Asus P8P67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 24 '22 at 20:19
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 79.6
1-Core 44
2-Core 88.2
46% 70.6 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 172
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Lighting 41.3
Reflection 54.7
Parallax 42.7
34% 46.2 fps
MRender 41.5
Gravity 43.4
Splatting 31.4
31% 38.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T1R0A-68A4W0 1TB
700GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 411000WR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 387 360 427 422 393 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 378
Write 436
Mixed 273
SusWrite 381
83% 367 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 34.1
113% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 185
178% 283 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 119%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
298GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 68 69 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 87.8
Write 83.7
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 67.5
55% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
210GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 113 113 115 113 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 54.6
Write 51.2
Mixed 47.4
SusWrite 111
49% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 2133 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
59.8% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 21.3
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 10.1
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback