Dell OptiPlex 3010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell OptiPlex 3010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 3010  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130916
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 24 '22 at 17:31
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 81
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 172
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 361
48% 361 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.88% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 0.7
2% 1.8 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.88%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 128GB SSD 128GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 168 163 161 154 131 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.2% Average
Read 237
Write 225
Mixed 208
SusWrite 162
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 10.6
71% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 87.6
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 16.6
42% 86.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
379GB free
Firmware: KC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 125 128 128 128 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 115
Write 125
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 127
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9905458-009.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 3010 Builds (Compare 4,340 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 3010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback