Notebook N85_87HP6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNotebook N85_87HP6  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook N85_87HP6
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '22 at 12:38
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 198
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 365
49% 365 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 8503) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4678
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
4.41% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 70.1
Parallax 5.7
4% 26.9 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 8.4
5% 6.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.41%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 275GB-$42
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 411 261 148 154 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 419
Write 407
Mixed 369
SusWrite 257
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 34.4
124% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 302
222% 286 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83%
Great: 95%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 128 135 135 135 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 118
Write 140
Mixed 62
SusWrite 134
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4S240FSDK.8FBD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 11.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 13.1
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N85_87HP6 Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook N85_87HP6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback