Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 79.8 1-Core 95.4 2-Core 176 68% 117 Pts	4-Core 344 8-Core 378 48% 361 Pts	64-Core 377 23% 377 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Fijitsu Siemens(1734 121C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9171 Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	2.92% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 7.2 Parallax 6.3 4% 6.27 fps	MRender 0.3 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.2 0% 0.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.92% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY256HDHP-00007 256GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT0106Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 50 50 63 49 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 391 Write 120 Mixed 125 SusWrite 49.7 37% 171 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 56.2 4K Mixed 23.9 102% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 313 DQ Write 83.5 DQ Mixed 86.5 93% 161 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 2x4GB 1,573 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	MC Read 27.8 MC Write 29.2 MC Mixed 22.7 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 18.9 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 80.9 49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 79%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	126x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	10x

SSD
MZ7TY256HDHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 89%, 796 samples	9x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	7x

RAM
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 16,202 samples	26x
M378A1G43EB1-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 3,078 samples	20x
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 6,175 samples	11x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $79