Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX100 S3 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3009-A1
Memory	8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120524
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 23 '22 at 10:11
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	96%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31220-$305 2,507 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 76.5 2-Core 151 61% 103 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 299 39% 295 Pts	64-Core 317 20% 317 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.77 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.2% Poor	Lighting 36.9 Reflection 40.5 Parallax 41.9 30% 39.8 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 38.7 Splatting 27.2 28% 34.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199 10,165 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 81 78 71 88 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 124 Write 175 Mixed 152 SusWrite 81.2 30% 133 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 39.2 4K Mixed 21.8 73% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 133 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 117 93% 130 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 66%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 60GB free Firmware: JC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 103 102 104 101 102 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	58% Above average	Read 101 Write 81.5 Mixed 56 SusWrite 101 62% 84.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1 164% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC4C SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 152 152 146 145 153 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 173 Mixed 81 SusWrite 146 107% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51272BA1339.M18F Samsung M391B5273DH0-YH9 CT51272BA1339.M18F Samsung M391B5273DH0-YH9 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.9% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 15.7 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 15.4 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 79.2 50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	2x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	2x

SSD
Agility 3 240GBOCZ $199Bench 52%, 10,165 samples	2x
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	1x
X300 256GBSanDisk $99Bench 79%, 2,341 samples	1x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-YH9 M391B5273DH0-YH9 8GBSamsungBench 51%, 10 samples	3x
CT51272BA1339.M18F Samsung M391B5273DH0-YH9 CT51272BA1339.M18F Samsung M391B5273DH0-YH9 16GBUnknownBench 49%, 3 samples	2x
M391B1G73BH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 73%, 170 samples	1x

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $504

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16