Acer Predator G3-572

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Predator G3-572  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Sienta_KLS
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190315
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateMay 22 '22 at 12:23
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 191
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 456
51% 402 Pts
64-Core 530
33% 530 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Acer(1025 118B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
30.7% Below average
Lighting 39.1
Reflection 41
Parallax 38.5
32% 39.5 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 40.9
Splatting 27.6
28% 35.6 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH 128GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK10D7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 443
Write 340
Mixed 295
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 25
94% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 10.6
82% 191 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 78%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
246GB free
Firmware: AX1P5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 90 90 89 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 86.4
Write 87.4
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 88.9
54% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 859B CT8G4SFS824A.C8FDD1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.3% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 21.9
72% 25 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 21
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3-572 Builds (Compare 1,411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G3-572

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback