LG 16Z90P-G.BH71P2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics78.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLG 16Z90P-G.BH71P2  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 16Z90P
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '22 at 02:47
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 61.3
1-Core 123
2-Core 132
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 346
44% 333 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1854 0400) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9836
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 22.2
Reflection 24.3
Parallax 27.7
18% 24.7 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 1
4% 5.97 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 20%
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.8% Very good
Lighting 85.7
Reflection 129
Parallax 153
70% 123 fps
MRender 147
Gravity 86
Splatting 120
96% 118 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 93%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CA5-8D256 256GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CQ21901
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 198 188 192 184 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1,721
Write 131
Mixed 303
SusWrite 180
125% 584 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 56.9
195% 69.7 MB/s
DQ Read 945
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 319
297% 483 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 165%
Great: 232%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung UBE3D4AA-MGCR 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 60.1
MC Mixed 41.7
128% 44.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 14.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 112%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 16Z90P-G.BH71P2 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: LG 16Z90P-G.BH71P2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback