Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics80% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateMay 21 '22 at 19:08
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 91.6
2-Core 181
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 334
43% 323 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80% Very good
Lighting 98.9
Reflection 118
Parallax 104
81% 107 fps
MRender 99.9
Gravity 100
Splatting 91
79% 97 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31256GTND 256GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 429
Write 355
Mixed 328
82% 371 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 37.7
140% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 212
184% 272 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
360GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 116 116 117 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
67% Good
Read 118
Write 128
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 116
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-024.A00G 859B BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD2 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.9% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16.7
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 4,358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H - $198

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback