Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '22 at 17:32
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 193
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 360
49% 365 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.9% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 119
Parallax 105
82% 108 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 101
Splatting 88.7
78% 96.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31256GTND 256GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 292 100 102 106 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 433
Write 281
Mixed 311
SusWrite 162
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 35.2
135% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 204
177% 260 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
466GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 125 125 126 125 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
66% Good
Read 106
Write 109
Mixed 66
SusWrite 124
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-024.A00G 859B BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD2 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.6% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 13.2
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 4,356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H - $198

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback