MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 214%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 206%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics199% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive337% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '22 at 08:30
Run Duration355 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$308
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 99.9
1-Core 163
2-Core 329
108% 197 Pts
4-Core 639
8-Core 1,045
103% 842 Pts
64-Core 1,507
93% 1,507 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
XFX(1EAE 6901) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.10.01.03
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
199% Outstanding
Lighting 251
Reflection 254
Parallax 504
205% 337 fps
MRender 405
Gravity 212
Splatting 339
261% 318 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 199%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP600 CORE 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM52.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3378 3377 3387 906 266 279 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
337% Outstanding
Read 1,641
Write 3379
Mixed 1,819
SusWrite 1,932
498% 2,193 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 92.4
316% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,369
DQ Write 1,124
DQ Mixed 1,244
932% 1,246 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 337%
Great: 442%
Corsair MP600 CORE 2TB
714GB free
Firmware: EGFM52.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3108 3171 3207 3245 3258 3244 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
417% Outstanding
Read 1,643
Write 3,132
Mixed 1,812
SusWrite 3,206
558% 2,448 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 212
4K Mixed 92.3
311% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,378
DQ Write 1,257
DQ Mixed 1,309
984% 1,315 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 417%
Great: 442%
Samsung 870 QVO 8TB-$580
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 29 29 29 35 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 129%
Samsung 870 QVO 8TB-$580
2TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 29 29 29 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 129%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180
1.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 13 13 11 11 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 97%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
378GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 84 86 85 87 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 102
Write 96
Mixed 89.8
SusWrite 85.7
69% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
169GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 58 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 117
Write 99.3
Mixed 97.5
SusWrite 58.9
69% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 60.6
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 47.4
128% 45 GB/s
SC Read 34.3
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 45.7
102% 35.7 GB/s
Latency 35.8
112% 35.8 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 127%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,476 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $922
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback