Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FA_S530FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FA_S530FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X530FA
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190530
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '22 at 07:19
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 91%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8145U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 217
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 316
41% 311 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1501) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
5.55% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 6.8
5% 5.97 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 6
Splatting 10.2
7% 8.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.55%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme TEAM TM8FP6256G 256GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM90.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 327 1058 29 8.4 868 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,084
Write 1,212
Mixed 1,018
SusWrite 439
211% 938 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 71.3
252% 92 MB/s
DQ Read 549
DQ Write 688
DQ Mixed 634
474% 624 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 176%
Great: 221%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
910GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 102 103 103 103 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 127
Write 132
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 102
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
216% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1B1 04CB AO1P24HC4R1-BUYS 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.2% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 21.2
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 22.1
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FA_S530FA Builds (Compare 142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FA_S530FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback