Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FA_S530FA

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FA_S530FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X530FA
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190530
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 20 '22 at 07:14
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%
CPU Throttled	91%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8145U 15,431 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 74.3 1-Core 118 2-Core 211 76% 135 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 313 42% 311 Pts	64-Core 320 20% 320 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 178,291 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1501) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	5.55% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 3.9 Parallax 6.9 5% 5.6 fps	MRender 8.2 Gravity 6 Splatting 10.1 7% 8.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.55% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme TEAM TM8FP6256G 256GB 213 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 209GB free (System drive) Firmware: EDFM90.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 718 1060 1029 1049 811 16 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	190% Outstanding	Read 922 Write 1,098 Mixed 1,014 SusWrite 780 216% 953 MB/s	4K Read 53.3 4K Write 151 4K Mixed 70.9 252% 91.7 MB/s	DQ Read 547 DQ Write 677 DQ Mixed 626 468% 617 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 190% Great: 221%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 910GB free Firmware: JU0C0J Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 138 Mixed 65 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.1 62% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 79%
UFDBM T7 38AD 16GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 15GB free, PID 6238 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 4.8 4.9 9.6 8.2 8.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	6.9% Terrible	Read 26.4 Write 7.3 Mixed 13.7 SusWrite 7.9 16% 13.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 24% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.9% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1B1 04CB AO1P24HC4R1-BUYS 8GB 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	69.3% Good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 26.1 MC Mixed 21.4 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 27 SC Mixed 22.4 63% 22.2 GB/s	Latency 91.8 44% 91.8 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FA_S530FA Builds (Compare 142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FA_S530FA

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	79x
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples	33x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	30x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	142x

SSD
SD9SN8W256G1102 256GBSandiskBench 69%, 3,311 samples	56x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV512TBN 512GBBench 79%, 14,424 samples	15x
SD9SN8W128G1102 128GBSandiskBench 67%, 2,914 samples	5x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	58x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 38,499 samples	18x
AO1P24HC4R1-BUYS 1x4GBAdataBench 39%, 295 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16