Supermicro SYS-520P-WTR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro SYS-520P-WTR  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X12SPW-TF
Memory121.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220214
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '22 at 16:35
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
CPU, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 57.4
1-Core 78.5
2-Core 160
55% 98.5 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 638
56% 478 Pts
64-Core 4,052
251% 4,052 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 456GB
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 298 305 349 358 365 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 1,092
Write 420
Mixed 371
SusWrite 335
122% 554 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 29.1
106% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 412
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 176
176% 287 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 112%
Great: 123%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 298 309 352 359 368 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 1,097
Write 405
Mixed 376
SusWrite 336
122% 554 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 31.4
113% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 447
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 182
184% 302 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 115%
Great: 184%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 7.5TB
7TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 128 135 144 121 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 566
Write 234
Mixed 74
SusWrite 132
182% 251 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.2
332% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 200%
Great: 180%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A8G40AB2-CWE 2x31.5GB
2 of 8 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
MC Read 44.9
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 33
110% 38.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 12.2
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback