Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Z9PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131118
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '22 at 14:18
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 68.2
1-Core 82.4
2-Core 158
59% 103 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 499
49% 403 Pts
64-Core 1,193
74% 1,193 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 144
Parallax 203
106% 159 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 152
Splatting 97
98% 122 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Avago MR9361-8i 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 825 832 836 839 832 830 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 80% Great: 87%
Avago MR9361-8i 600GB
486GB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 188 188 188 188 189 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.7% Poor
Read 184
Write 182
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 188
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.5
6% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 23%
Avago MR9361-8i 450GB
266GB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 170 170 170 172 169 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
97.3% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 154
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 170
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1.5
305% 2.37 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.5% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6.5
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $361
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback