HP EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive271% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8592
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '22 at 09:32
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$237
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 80.1
1-Core 112
2-Core 286
84% 159 Pts
4-Core 567
8-Core 1,127
100% 847 Pts
64-Core 1,120
69% 1,120 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8592) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8984
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.11% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 8.8
5% 8.27 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 12
9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.11%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GB
231GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA73H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 742 613 616 615 611 612 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 2,312
Write 1,865
Mixed 981
SusWrite 635
322% 1,448 MB/s
4K Read 60.8
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 77.7
258% 88.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,518
DQ Write 1,166
DQ Mixed 1,327
997% 1,337 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 271%
Great: 295%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 170 174 175 174 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 180
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 174
104% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x5D07] GR2666D464L19/16G Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
90% Excellent
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 28.5
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 34.5
SC Mixed 27.5
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 90%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF Builds (Compare 419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback