Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211001
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 17 '22 at 06:36
Run Duration553 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$296
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 81.6
1-Core 209
2-Core 367
116% 219 Pts
4-Core 694
8-Core 1,021
107% 857 Pts
64-Core 1,014
63% 1,014 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Asus(1043 8818) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3850 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 126
Parallax 131
116% 133 fps
MRender 150
Gravity 108
Splatting 93.5
93% 117 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 107%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 1T00 1TB
840GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401120RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 476 476 476 483 487 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 424
Write 396
Mixed 340
SusWrite 471
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 45.7
171% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 251
208% 302 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 113%
Great: 118%
Hitachi HDS723015BLA642 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: MN5OA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 137 137 137 137 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 106
Write 106
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 137
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 79%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
846GB free
Firmware: 0342
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 110 110 110 110 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 131
Write 106
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 109
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 99%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB
458GB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 34.9
Write 29
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 42
24% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.5
192% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 88%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
297GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 139 138 133 132 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
70% Very good
Read 104
Write 121
Mixed 96.1
SusWrite 136
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.6
471% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 70%
Great: 90%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 164 163 175 166 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
70% Good
Read 76
Write 105
Mixed 78.1
SusWrite 166
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.5
227% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 70%
Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 111 116 112 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 106
Write 144
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 112
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.7
319% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 92%
Lexar Pro LRW400 -1 256GB
154GB free, PID b054
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 86 86 85 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 88.3
Write 79.9
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 85.2
100% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 5.2
339% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial 32G48C40U5.M16A1 1x31GB
1 of 3 slots used
31GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
87.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 30.1
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 24.9
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z690 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 3,426 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS MASTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $1,016
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback