Biostar H81MHV3 3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar H81MHV3 3.0  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '22 at 23:09
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 184
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 342
48% 352 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$230
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74% Very good
Lighting 101
Reflection 81.6
Parallax 97
82% 93.3 fps
MRender 82.8
Gravity 70.2
Splatting 61.9
58% 71.6 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3Z40107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 162 200 47 12 231 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 448
Write 391
Mixed 366
SusWrite 161
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 24.5
120% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 45.8
94% 185 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
416GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 143 143 146 146 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 170
Write 128
Mixed 82.4
SusWrite 142
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
203% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/4G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.9% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 67.3
60% 67.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81MHV3 3.0 Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H81MHV3 3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $363
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback