Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA (all builds)
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210325
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	May 16 '22 at 12:58
Run Duration	350 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Memory 87.5 1-Core 113 2-Core 221 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 639 63% 517 Pts	64-Core 866 54% 866 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 3667) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 497.29 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Lighting 20.6 Reflection 18.2 Parallax 21.1 17% 20 fps	MRender 25 Gravity 22.7 Splatting 16.7 17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$152 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 644GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1523 1418 1418 1424 1420 1399 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	274% Outstanding	Read 2,404 Write 1,559 Mixed 919 SusWrite 1,434 351% 1,579 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 55.1 192% 69.7 MB/s	DQ Read 871 DQ Write 534 DQ Mixed 747 544% 717 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 274% Great: 372%
Nvme KINGSTON SNVS100 1TB 394 User benchmarks, average bench 169% 705GB free Firmware: S8442101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 764 112 1088 1236 1241 1240 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	179% Outstanding	Read 1,227 Write 1,238 Mixed 906 SusWrite 947 243% 1,080 MB/s	4K Read 39.1 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 23 146% 56.7 MB/s	DQ Read 621 DQ Write 728 DQ Mixed 405 380% 585 MB/s
Poor: 100% ↑ This bench: 179% Great: 242%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 113GB free Firmware: M0CR031 SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 429 380 241 242 241 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Read 459 Write 368 Mixed 373 SusWrite 326 86% 382 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 69.6 4K Mixed 34.5 118% 42.9 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 203 152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 99%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 35GB free Firmware: X31200RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 211 219 199 204 152 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Read 467 Write 415 Mixed 308 SusWrite 230 79% 355 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 63.3 4K Mixed 36.1 124% 42.8 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 192 148% 201 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 560GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 140 141 140 140 141 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Read 148 Write 113 Mixed 83 SusWrite 138 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 114%
ST350041 3AS 500GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 160GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 38 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Read 36.8 Write 37.1 Mixed 27.3 SusWrite 38.4 47% 34.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 45%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB 316 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 41GB free, PID 0747 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 47 48 48 48 47 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 87.6 Write 47 Mixed 59.7 SusWrite 47 76% 60.3 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 4.5 292% 5.5 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 12,524 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 44.3 MC Write 38.4 MC Mixed 36 113% 39.6 GB/s	SC Read 26.2 SC Write 40.1 SC Mixed 30.6 92% 32.3 GB/s	Latency 70 57% 70 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 3,003 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	567x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	528x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $199Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	457x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	325x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	269x
RTX 3070Nvidia $300Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	194x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	264x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	185x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $152Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	144x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	146x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	62x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $128Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	54x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,265

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16