HP ProLiant ML150 Gen9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive21.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProLiant ML150 Gen9  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '22 at 06:08
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 67
1-Core 53.2
2-Core 108
47% 76.1 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 278
32% 247 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000D
Nvidia(10DE 096F) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.84
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
7.51% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 10.6
7% 9.83 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 9.7
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.51%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WD20EZAZ-00L 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 117 168 158 168 174 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.7% Poor
Read 174
Write 153
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 152
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 1.1
19% 6.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1.7
DQ Write 12.3
DQ Mixed 3
4% 5.67 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HP 752368-081 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.4% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 29
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 12.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant ML150 Gen9 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: HP ProLiant ML150 Gen9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $207
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback