HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemHP ProLiant DL360 Gen9  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory3.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150720
Uptime14.4 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '20 at 12:41
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2603 v3
Proc 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 52.1
1-Core 36.1
2-Core 72.2
34% 53.5 Pts
4-Core 141
8-Core 250
24% 195 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 39%
Great: 51%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 500GB
229GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 28 34 29 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 72.6
Write 24.4
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 26.1
28% 37.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HP 752368-081 4x8GB
4 of 24 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.6% Average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 17.4
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8.8
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant DL360 Gen9 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 13% - Very poor Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback