HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics75.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory6.7 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '22 at 02:26
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 90%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5640
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 99.1
1-Core 35.7
2-Core 81.2
50% 72 Pts
4-Core 97
8-Core 111
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.7% Very good
Lighting 91.6
Reflection 106
Parallax 96
75% 98 fps
MRender 92.8
Gravity 95.5
Splatting 96.1
78% 94.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT09L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 135 162 155 213 220 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.3% Below average
Read 206
Write 158
Mixed 111
SusWrite 165
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 19.6
4K Mixed 15
40% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 57.7
78% 142 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT351R7CFR4A-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351R7CFR4A-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351R7CFR4A-H9 46GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
30.4% Below average
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 9.8
26% 8.97 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.7
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 40.3
99% 40.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback