Huawei BOD-WXX9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHuawei BOD-WXX9  (all builds)
MotherboardHUAWEI BOD-WXX9-PCB
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210714
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 15 '22 at 16:36
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 60.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 195
70% 127 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 601
59% 485 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Quanta(152D 127D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9565
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 22.6
Parallax 25
16% 22.5 fps
MRender 20.1
Gravity 29.9
Splatting 16.5
18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1027 512GB
342GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21112000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 775 421 424 422 431 430 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,507
Write 1,318
Mixed 1,131
SusWrite 484
248% 1,110 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 48.2
183% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,237
DQ Write 934
DQ Mixed 967
755% 1,046 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 194%
Great: 226%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 0GB
1GB free, PID 1603
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.1 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
5.19% Terrible
Read 20
Write 4.7
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 5.1
10% 8.82 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
22% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.19%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT40A512M16LY-075:E 2x4GB
2 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
67.6% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 19.8
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 15.5
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical BOD-WXX9 Builds (Compare 1,205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Huawei BOD-WXX9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback