Microelectronics G167

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicroelectronics G167  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '22 at 22:45
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$430
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 95.6
1-Core 155
2-Core 280
99% 177 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 1,139
102% 862 Pts
64-Core 2,122
131% 2,122 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
Asus(1043 8822) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 512.77
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 105
Parallax 124
109% 121 fps
MRender 169
Gravity 97.3
Splatting 70.1
87% 112 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 101%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
687GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 233010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1188 348 351 340 267 336 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,414
Write 1546
Mixed 1,235
SusWrite 472
262% 1,167 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 48.2
161% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,241
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 305
320% 561 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 166%
Great: 276%
WDC WDS200T2B0C-00PXH0 2TB
928GB free
Firmware: 21705000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 465 465 224 191 165 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,598
Write 1,696
Mixed 1,424
SusWrite 333
283% 1,263 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 48.9
176% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,165
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 225
271% 506 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 167%
Great: 283%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 45 48 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 31.8
Write 82.6
Mixed 32.9
SusWrite 46.6
36% 48.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
72% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C16-16GVKC 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
98.6% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 29.6
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 36.8
SC Mixed 26.4
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 55.3
72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G167 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Microelectronics G167

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $459
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback