BOXX 3DBOXX W8920

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemBOXX 3DBOXX W8920  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DAi
Memory41.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130805
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateMay 13 '22 at 22:24
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 180
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 749
67% 566 Pts
64-Core 1,950
121% 1,950 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.3.1
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.3% Above average
Lighting 63.3
Reflection 61.8
Parallax 87.3
52% 70.8 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 45.6
48% 60.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LF1i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 124 128 141 135 135 MB/s
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.7% Good
Read 270
Write 198
Mixed 209
SusWrite 136
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 32.4
102% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 176
146% 215 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 88%
Liteonit LCT-128M3S 128GB
98GB free
Firmware: VQN6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 200 199 174 200 199 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.2% Above average
Read 234
Write 192
Mixed 172
SusWrite 195
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 23.6
84% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 126
110% 163 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 82%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 135 138 137 138 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 132
Write 85.6
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 135
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 87%
RDP8 CF 4GB
4GB free, PID 5038
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 7.7 7.7 7.8 7.7 7.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.64% Terrible
Read 7.7
Write 6.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 7.7
9% 6.65 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.64%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GE7BFR8A HMT41GE7AFR8A HMT41GE7BFR8A HMT41GE7AFR8A Adata HMT41GE7BFR8A HMT41GE7BFR8A HMT41GE7BFR8A 64GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 31
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.1
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3DBOXX W8920 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: BOXX 3DBOXX W8920

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 6% - Terrible Total price: $132
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback