Asus Q87M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Q87M-E  (all builds)
Memory22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '22 at 14:01
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1246 v3-$200
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 59.7
2-Core 177
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 522
51% 418 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 181
Parallax 170
133% 171 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 171
Splatting 122
114% 141 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 121%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 99 43 43 42 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 469
Write 472
Mixed 349
SusWrite 116
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 42.6
151% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 232
209% 316 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 126%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
344GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 110 79 79 104 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 91.2
Write 67.4
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 99.7
59% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 96%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
632GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 109 109 109 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 127
Write 124
Mixed 88.4
SusWrite 108
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-138.A00LF Hynix HMT41GU7AFR8A-PB 9965525-138.A00LF Hynix HMT41GU7AFR8A-PB 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 16
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q87M-E Builds (Compare 1,243 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus Q87M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $375
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback