Asus H170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 154%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics201% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '22 at 12:31
Run Duration298 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 195
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 625
62% 505 Pts
64-Core 606
38% 606 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$615
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
201% Outstanding
Lighting 290
Reflection 286
Parallax 314
237% 297 fps
MRender 348
Gravity 252
Splatting 188
206% 263 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 201%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 262 294 294 292 298 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 420
Write 411
Mixed 358
SusWrite 281
83% 367 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 44.4
158% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 234
201% 298 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 113%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
215GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 349 421 435 427 431 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 395
Mixed 353
SusWrite 374
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 51.3
168% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 267
220% 315 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 109%
Great: 125%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
277GB free
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1735 1698 1675 1776 1757 1657 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 1705
Write 1,940
Mixed 2,001
SusWrite 1,716
416% 1,840 MB/s
4K Read 71.6
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 93
306% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,277
DQ Write 801
DQ Mixed 918
717% 999 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 314%
Great: 488%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 117 114 118 119 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 92.4
Write 44.7
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 115
58% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
378GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 80 80 81 82 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
43% Average
Read 70.5
Write 36.7
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 79.3
44% 58.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43%
Great: 59%
USB 2.0 Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 1976
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1 1 1.1 1 0.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
2.56% Terrible
Read 9
Write 0.7
Mixed 2
SusWrite 1
3% 3.17 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.56%
Great: 3%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 23.5
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 22
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,092 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus H170 PRO GAMING - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $803
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback