HP ProBook 645 G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 645 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80FE
Memory5.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '22 at 11:05
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A8-8600B R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
U4500, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
27% Poor
Memory 33.3
1-Core 53.5
2-Core 80.5
32% 55.8 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 120
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 119
7% 119 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
HP(103C 80FE) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.09.04.01
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
4.02% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 7.5
4% 6.2 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 5.6
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 4.02%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 98 112 8.2 42 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 416
Write 363
Mixed 341
SusWrite 74.7
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 0.2
50% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 4.4
DQ Mixed 19.7
23% 41.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 92%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$7
10GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 25 24 25 25 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 115
Write 26.9
Mixed 52.9
SusWrite 25.1
61% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.2
158% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
21.1% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.43 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7.8
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 236
17% 236 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 645 G2 Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 645 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback