Asus BM5242(BM5342,BM5642)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus BM5242(BM5342,BM5642)  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK BM5242(BM5342,BM5642)
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20111227
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 11 '22 at 04:18
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Memory 61.9
1-Core 40.8
2-Core 81.3
39% 61.3 Pts
4-Core 77.4
8-Core 90.7
11% 84.1 Pts
64-Core 90.5
6% 90.5 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9400 GT
Device(196D 0000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.07% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.87 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.07%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$58
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF430400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 134 102 66 50 43 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.4% Below average
Read 222
Write 192
Mixed 175
SusWrite 93.4
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 16
4K Mixed 15.1
51% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 17.5
DQ Write 20
DQ Mixed 17
13% 18.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
271GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 161 152 151 161 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 151
Write 150
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 155
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88%
Great: 109%
Generic USB SD Reader 4GB
3GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 2.2
1% 2.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 1% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.57 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical BM5242(BM5342,BM5642) Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus BM5242(BM5342,BM5642)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $151
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback