Asus P8H77-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-V  (all builds)
Memory15.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141027
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMay 10 '22 at 22:59
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 152
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 474
47% 385 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 1777 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Lighting 38.7
Reflection 45.6
Parallax 40.3
32% 41.5 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 30.5
30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 432GB
357GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 418 448 450 406 450 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
101% Outstanding
Read 833
Write 531
Mixed 421
SusWrite 432
123% 554 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 29
109% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 36.9
DQ Mixed 124
103% 156 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 101%
Great: 133%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
469GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 144 142 143 131 147 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 141
Write 144
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 139
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.1
233% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U7EFR8C-RD Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G HMT325U7EFR8C-RD Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.7% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 16.8
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-V Builds (Compare 994 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $566
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback