Asus PRIME Z270-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics39.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-P  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170616
Uptime10.1 Days
Run DateMay 10 '22 at 21:48
Run Duration308 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 132
2-Core 271
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 528
67% 506 Pts
64-Core 537
33% 537 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
Asus(1043 0501) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.4.1
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.9% Below average
Lighting 46.5
Reflection 61.3
Parallax 71.5
38% 59.8 fps
MRender 61.5
Gravity 58
Splatting 45
44% 54.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,661
Write 8,450
Mixed 2,040
1,271% 5,717 MB/s
4K Read 589
4K Write 300
4K Mixed 385
1,545% 425 MB/s
DQ Read 1,605
DQ Write 1,026
DQ Mixed 1,226
938% 1,286 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
177GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2322 762 762 758 759 759 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
312% Outstanding
Read 2,284
Write 2,389
Mixed 1,865
SusWrite 1,020
424% 1,890 MB/s
4K Read 68.6
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 96.7
321% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1600
DQ Write 1,017
DQ Mixed 1,269
957% 1,295 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 312%
Great: 355%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
360GB free
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1964 1640 246 292 263 287 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 1,673
Write 2,112
Mixed 1,774
SusWrite 782
357% 1,585 MB/s
4K Read 63.3
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 88.3
294% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,521
DQ Write 1,064
DQ Mixed 1203
922% 1,262 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 263%
Great: 295%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95
815GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 112 113 114 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 102
Write 100
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 113
69% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
891GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 119 119 112 119 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 61.9
Write 63.4
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 116
57% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
95% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 29.2
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 28.5
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 54.7
73% 54.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z270-P Builds (Compare 6,402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-P - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $645
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback