Acer Nitro N50-640

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Nitro N50-640  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Nitro N50-640
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '22 at 14:43
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Memory 79.1
1-Core 181
2-Core 320
104% 193 Pts
4-Core 613
8-Core 952
97% 782 Pts
64-Core 1,217
75% 1,217 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Sapphire(174B A630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 122
Parallax 126
110% 128 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 104
Splatting 90.1
90% 113 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1322 1522 1462 284 314 389 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 1578
Write 1,488
Mixed 1,469
SusWrite 882
304% 1,354 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 82
279% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,246
DQ Write 925
DQ Mixed 1,049
794% 1,073 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 252%
Great: 253%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
748GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 456 462 461 465 463 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 472
Mixed 452
SusWrite 452
106% 468 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 55.7
169% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 337
254% 341 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
786GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 67 72 72 71 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 72.9
Write 72.5
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 70.5
86% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 43%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00SPEB0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 0.8 1.1 1 1 0.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 70.9
Write 72.6
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 1.6
68% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 59%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00GXCB0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 67 71 72 71 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 177
Write 178
Mixed 129
SusWrite 70
181% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
132% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 66%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
360GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 0.8 1 1 1 0.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 103
Write 65.5
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 1.6
78% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB-$85
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
93.4% Outstanding
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 32
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 37.2
SC Mixed 28.5
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro N50-640 Builds (Compare 1,859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: Acer Nitro N50-640

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback