Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics66.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120221
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateOct 04 '17 at 11:50
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 198
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 484
50% 402 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Gigabyte(1458 367C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66.9% Good
Lighting 86.6
Reflection 84.4
Parallax 74.9
70% 82 fps
MRender 78.8
Gravity 75.3
Splatting 67.2
60% 73.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Portable SSD T3 250GB
92GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.7% Terrible
Read 22.8
Write 22.2
Mixed 22.5
5% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.49
4K Write 7.19
4K Mixed 4.87
21% 6.51 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 8.7%
Great: 75%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.4% Below average
Read 210
Write 119
Mixed 92.3
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 7.33
54% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 21.7
DQ Write 41.5
DQ Mixed 6.9
12% 23.4 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
186GB free
Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 131
Write 115
Mixed 88.3
83% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.06
4K Write 1.06
4K Mixed 0.42
110% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 88%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
823GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 23
Write 22.1
Mixed 21
28% 22 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.23
70% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 17.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,499 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $901
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback