Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics78.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '22 at 08:29
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 73.8
2-Core 133
59% 96.2 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 398
38% 317 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.5% Very good
Lighting 97
Reflection 106
Parallax 95.9
79% 99.5 fps
MRender 94.2
Gravity 95.6
Splatting 94.3
78% 94.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 535 Series 240GB-$200
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RG20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 197 209 205 196 203 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.4% Good
Read 249
Write 234
Mixed 227
SusWrite 199
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 35.8
112% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 34.2
DQ Write 93.1
DQ Mixed 43.7
39% 57 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 80 80 79 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 201
Write 163
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 79.1
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
817GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 199 199 203 199 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 151
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 199
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
214GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 80 80 78 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 59.7
Write 65.6
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 79.1
47% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.6% Average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 16.5
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.8
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback