Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics78.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '22 at 07:46
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 122
57% 91.7 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 400
38% 316 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.1% Very good
Lighting 96.3
Reflection 106
Parallax 96.3
78% 99.4 fps
MRender 94.2
Gravity 95.4
Splatting 94
77% 94.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 535 Series 240GB-$200
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RG20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 204 205 198 205 213 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.5% Good
Read 280
Write 229
Mixed 237
SusWrite 201
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 35.1
115% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 33.7
DQ Write 92.5
DQ Mixed 43.7
39% 56.6 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
931GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 73 68 69 61 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 199
Write 171
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 70.1
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
817GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 200 201 202 202 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 153
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 199
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 114%
Great: 112%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
214GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 73 68 69 61 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 63.2
Write 29.6
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 70
40% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.2% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 16.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.3
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback